Anonymous Blogging – is there value?

About the Author

author photo

Ohg Rea Tone is all or nothing. He is educated and opinionated, more clever than smart, sarcastic and forthright. He writes intuitively - often disregarding rules of composition. Comment on his posts - he will likely respond with characteristic humor or genuine empathy. He is the real-deal.

See All Posts by This Author

Anonymous Blogging – is there value?

Son,

Words – are they the same if you know who said them than if you do not know? Do words stand on their own? Does an idea stand on it’s own? Or is in necessary to put everything in the context of who said it?

I write as Ohg Rea Tone, a nom de plume of dubious invent. My purpose is simple – I want to write honestly, but I live in a bible-belt conservative town. There are real consequences. I have advertised this blog with everyone I care about in this town – they know me and accept me for who I am. I am less confident about others. My experience of being outspoken in this community is that it does not pay.

I argue that the words stand on their own. That ideas stand on their own. One of the fundamental concepts of scholarly writing is that the writer state their prejudices up front – a qualifier of sorts. We excuse ourselves as just being bloggers – we don’t have to do research and we can say anything we want. We let the market decide if they want to read us or not.

If we knew nothing of our Founding Fathers; if we did not know they lived under the rule of King George III of England, If we did not know they were tobacco farmers or slave owners or scientists or businessmen or farmers – would that change the way we perceive the three documents that define our country? Some think it is critical to put the documents in the context of their time. One of the most significant events in our country’s history is the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence. It has become cliche to say, “Let me put my John Hancock on this.” Those men had the courage to publicly sign the document.

How about the Bible? Is it important to know who wrote it and why? What were they thinking? The Bible was written anonymously – scholars invest lifetimes in trying to discover the authors – is that relevant to the message? I am one who argues that the context of the Bible is important, both from a historical perspective and the perspective of the authors.

If we found a copy of “A Tale of Two Cities” and did not know of Charles Dickens – would the manuscript have merit? It would, but it has more value when we understand the life of Dickens. I am one who thinks that knowing about the life of Mark Twain adds value to Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn.

A few years ago somebody wrote a novel called “Primary Colors.” It purportedly told the story of Bill Clinton’s quest for the Presidency. It was published anonymously. In this case the ‘anonymous’ nature seemed to add value – the author let the story stand on it’s own. The book was a best seller. The mystique of anonymity added value.

We are bloggers. As I have said to you in private conversations, we must be careful with our identity – we have to protect our families. We have put ourselves out before the world. We talk about our families in this blog, but we are careful. I say things like ‘your mother’ or ‘your sister’ or ‘your daughter.’ Careful not to say names that could bring grief into their lives.

There are personal blogs. Your wife has a wonderful blog where I can go to see pages of pictures of my grandchildren. I enjoy this blog immensely. But I also know that she distributes it to family and friends. The news media is going crazy today with the tale of a wacko sex offender who video taped his encounter with a small child. Those people are out there and they scare me.

I am quick to take anonymous shots at politicians, journalists, radio hosts, theologians, other bloggers, anyone is fair game. Is it fair that I write under an assumed name?

Readers?

Dad (Ohg Rea Tone)

See Also: On Writing, Blogging, Journalism 

There Are 5 Responses So Far. »

  1. I think remaining anonymous is your own decision. I put my names in my own blog because I know, for the most part, who is reading it. But I do not publicly share more than what state I live in for fear of others abusing that knowledge.
    By not being anonymous, I do not have the liberty to post whatever I want. I know who reads my blog on a regular basis, and I am very careful not to put things out there that I do not want to talk about in the future. Sometimes, if I cannot hold it back, I try to preface my post with “just some thoughts” or something else so I do not have to be held accountable for what I write.
    Other times, I put those thoughts because I do want to discuss them. Having a blog and knowing who reads it, when they know who I am, gives me an accountability I would not have otherwise.
    It is much easier to be anonymous. Then you do not have to live as you write.

  2. I post with my real name. I do this so that I realize the responsibility of what I write. I do not, and will not, publish my wife’s name or the city in which we live. I suppose if people payed enough attention to my posts they would be able to find me. I know there are weirdo’s out there but I don’t want to live in fear. I suppose that I am lucky in the fact that my town is not that reactionary to differing thoughts. I live in a larger town with a larger community so even though I use my name really I am fairly anonymous. If a student at my school found out I really don’t think I would be that concerned as my college is fairly open to searching to own your beliefs.

    http://struggleswithfaith.wordpress.com

  3. […] wrote an interesting post today on Anonymous Blogging – is there value?Here’s a quick […]

  4. […] wrote an interesting post today on Anonymous Blogging – is there value?Here’s a quick […]

  5. It’s a good point – does the context of the piece influence our perception of it?
    Id say most definitely.
    Even as a blogger i think im still prone to taking a piece written for a site like ‘guardian online’ more seriously than something i read on wordpress.
    I bet alot of bloggers on here fall into the same trap too; its not easy to read a blog youve never come across before and gauge the authenticity of it completely independently, and its a skill im still working on.
    There’s no assumed authority or reputation to fall back on, so you’re essentially having to work out whether the writer is reputable or not completely on the fly.
    If blogging has done anything, its made us all think more critically!

Post a Response