The Threat of Fascism in 21st Century America
wpedon id=8560

About the Author

author photo

Ohg Rea Tone is all or nothing. He is educated and opinionated, more clever than smart, sarcastic and forthright. He writes intuitively - often disregarding rules of composition. Comment on his posts - he will likely respond with characteristic humor or genuine empathy. He is the real-deal.

See All Posts by This Author

The Threat of Fascism in 21st Century America

feature photo

Fascism – a scary word.  Most of us do not know what fascism means – we just feel certain it has something to do with a bad method of government or of economic systems.  Fascism is a word like Communism or Socialism or Marxism – we don’t feel the need to understand the exact meaning to understand that it is something evil.  But it is worth noting how any of these governing or economic systems become reality – understanding the ideas that spawn different systems is the primary method of protecting ourselves from domination by evil.  Understanding how those ideas are relevant in real time is critical to good decision making by any populace.

communist flagFascism is essentially a form of government.  The purpose of fascism is to protect a national identity, the supremacy of one national or ethnic group.  The method of Fascism is an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.  Very few Americans in the early 21st Century would openly advocate either the purpose or method of fascism.  But yet fascism is on the rise in America as an unintended consequence of economic despair, fear of the future, and general ignorance of democratic methods of government.

tyrany of liberalismFascism is fundamentally opposed to democracy and political liberalism.  Political  Liberalism is defined as:

A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual and favoring civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority.

This definition seems a reasonable manner of political ideology.  Ironically – it is the quest for this exact form of government in times of economic despair that lead political factions toward Ozzie and Harrietfascism.  When afraid, humans reach back into their mental tool box for the safe security of certainty.  We nostalgically perceive past times of less stress, of economic security, of greater moral values – we long for those times.  The emotional reaction to fear is to strike out at authority – to blame someone – and to force change.  Fear sees progress as the problem – desiring a return to safer times.

There are generally five main components of fascism, and how these apply in 2010 America:

Huckabee on Liberalism(1) Extreme nationalism, the belief that there is a clearly defined nation which has its own distinctive characteristics, culture, and interests, and which is superior to others. (Conservative political candidates for President and Congress have called for the Bible to take precedent over the Constitution.  There is an implication by some right wing groups that our current government no longer represents who we are as a culture.)

(2) An assertion of national decline—that at some point in the mythical past the nation was great, with harmonious social and political relationships, and dominant over others, and that subsequently it has disintegrated, become vatican IIinternally fractious and divided, and subordinate to lesser nations.  (With a rising national debt and unilateral entry into war – America is increasingly seen as weaker and isolated from the world community.  Some conservatives long for the culture of the 1950’s – a time before Civil Rights, before Vatican II, before Medicare, before Vietnam, and before extreme partisan bickering.)

(3) This process of national decline is often linked to a diminution of the racial purity of the nation. In some movements the nation is regarded as co-extensive with the race (the nation race), while in others, hierarchies of races are defined generically with nations located within them (the race nation); in virtually all Barack Hussein Obamacases, the view is taken that the introduction of impurities has weakened the nation and been responsible for its plight.  (The election of our first Black President, Barack Obama, caused many closet racists to directly relate the economic strife to a loss of white supremacy- this phenomenon is not necessarily a conscious thought – but the result of fear of economic security.  Because the language of racism is no longer acceptable  the conservative right  focus is against immigration.immigration - stop the invasion From  ‘…totalitarianism and dictatorship have been replaced by lesser demands for a significant strengthening in the authority of the state, allegedly within a democratic framework; productionism has become interventionism; and military glory has been largely eschewed.’)

(4) The blame for national decline and/or racial miscegenation is laid at the door of a conspiracy on the part of other nations/races seen as competing in a desperate struggle for dominance. (Leaders of the Tea Party movement advocate conspiracies of the ‘liberal left.’  The signs carried at rallies denote blame others for failurepictures of the President as a socialist, with a Hitler mustache.  The goal of the ‘conspiracy’ is to remove individual liberty, then create a system of socialism, and to take guns away from the general populace.  Republican Representatives openly encourage the belief in outrageous conspiracies – playing on the emotional distress of economic despair.)

(5) In that struggle, both capitalism and its political form, liberal democracy, shut the fuck upare seen as mere divisive devices designed to fragment the nation and subordinate it further in the world order. (The great irony in early 21st Century America is irrational fear of political liberalism.  Freedom Works and The Tea Party both advocate individual liberty – while seeking a nostalgic return to a white dominated society where poverty limits individual freedom.)

Methods are loosely defined by current unwitting fascist promoters.  Essentially these methods have a common goal:

1. the first priority is the reconstitution of the nation as an entity by restoring its purity.  (The mission statement of the Tea Party movement: A community coulter - convert to Christcommitted to standing together, shoulder to shoulder, to protect our country and the Constitution upon which we were founded. Again – a nostalgic idea that somehow political liberalism has diminished or undermined our country.  The reality is that political liberalism is exactly how we were founded.)

Hitler military portrait2. The second is to restore national dominance by reorganizing the polity, the economy, and society. See Tea Party Patriots and Freedom Works.

Means to this end include variously:

(a) the institution of an authoritarian and antiliberal state dominated by a single party;

(b) total control by the latter over political aggregation, communication, and socialization;

(c) direction by the state of labour and consumption to create a productionist and self-sufficient economy; and

(d) a charismatic leader embodying the ‘real’ interests of the nation and Palin dumbocracyenergizing the masses. With these priorities fulfilled, the nation would then be in a position to recapture its dominance, if necessary by military means.  (Think Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, and Sarah Palin.  Freedom Works openly identifies former GOP Representative Dick Armey as their leader.  Their Mission statement says Armey,  “…has an unrivalled ability to reach opinion leaders and elected officials with innovative policy ideas and effective strategies for change…”)

Historically – the extreme result of economic insecurity fostered fascist governments.  We note the despair of Germany after World War I.  Fascist leaders deny that they are fascists.  Modern conservative leaders glorify some mystical idea about what America used to be.  The legitimate fear of economic despair is used to imply that our government has somehow morphed into a totalitarian state.

The appeal to diverse groups of Americans rests in obscure ideas of nostalgic patriotism.  The idea of The State, as defined by Freedom Works or The Tea Party, glorify a past that never existed.  The argument of a return to peace and tranquility – led by the conservative organizers – is the emotional charge.

The Republican Party is scared.  Historically the party of business, of the elite upper classes, the GOP fears democratic political domination by the lower classes.  The GOP sold their souls to the devil when they partnered with Christian Fundamentalism to gain votes.  The mastery of fascism in Church organization by right wing Christian organization is being introduced in the GOP political arena.

Modern Pictures of Fascism


When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross.” Sinclair Lewis

That which the Fascists hate above all else, is intelligence.Miguel De Unamuno

Fascism is nothing but capitalist reaction.Leon Trotsky

Fascism is capitalism plus murder.Upton Sinclair

Fascism was a counter-revolution against a revolution that never took place.Ignazio Silone

Fascism is not defined by the number of its victims, but by the way it kills them.Jean-Paul Sartre

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. The far left needed a mass mobilization war against a supposedly “rightist” adversary in order to succeed in their goal of driving the two great Anglo-Saxon powers, the United States and Great Britain further to the left. They knew that the “New Deal” was running out of steam in America by the late 1930s and in Britain society had weathered the economic downturn of the 1930s with a coalition government for most of that decade that pretty much was committed to maintaining the status quo.

    Originally, when the Soviet Union invaded neutral Finland Churchill wanted to throw England’s support to the Finns and even suggested that the Royal Air Force bomb the Russian oil fields in the Caucasus from their bases in Iraq. In the end he was blackmailed by the left to throw his support to the brutal Soviet regime headed by Stalin and his henchmen, while promising the “workers” that when the mass mobilization war ended there would be a new social order in Britain.

    In America the left also saw a mass mobilization war against an allegedly far right enemy as a way to drive our nation into socialism. FDR even wanted to declare a new “bill of economic rights” to supplement the original Bill of Rights which covered civil liberty.

    Supporting Stalin against Hitler and Mussolini made even less sense than the opposite strategy of supporting the Germans and Italians against the Russians and their allies would have. Once we understand that there is really no difference between what the left calls Fascism and Communism we should be able to see that the contest is between Individualism and Collectivism. As the old saying goes, “When the boot of oppression is on your neck it matters not whether it is the right boot or the left one.”

    Anti-fascism has been used by the left to mask the fact that the goal of all Collectivists is absolute control by a central authority. In France after the end of the occupation the “right” was disestablished and the old pre-war “center” took their place on the right of the new collectivist political spectrum. The same happened in Czechoslovakia before the Communists completed their subjugation of that nation.

    The National Socialist and Fascist nations were defeated in 1945, while the Soviet Union survived until 1989, yet the left continues to warn us of the dangers of “fascism” but derides those who warn of the dangers of communism or socialism. Collectivism is the threat we face, whether it goes by the name of fascism, communism, environmentalism, social justice, economic justice, political correctness, sensitivity or you-name-it.